Home  |  Donate  |  Mailing List  
Linking people, land, and community
About the Society 
Events 
Local Currencies 
Community Land Trusts 
SHARE Microcredit 
Training Seminars 
Library 
Publications 
Newsletters 
MANAS Journal 
Additional Resources 
Membership 
Contact 
 
by building local economies
    Publications: Robert Swann's Early Essays on Local Currencies

Establishing an Alternative Independent Currency
by Robert Swann, 1980

 View essay as PDF


Introduction

To create a governmental monetary system, I think it must be agreed that some form of reserve in actual commodities must be used as a redemption system. Many economists are beginning to recognize that there is a need for a redemption system so long as governments continue to control the monetary system. On a radio broadcast, an economist who is also managing editor of Business Week recently stated that a few years ago, he would have denied the need for a redemption system-as have most economists since the 1930s . The recent experience of inflation, however, changed his mind, he said. He is now convinced that in order to keep governments honest, a redemption system is necessary. If such a redemption system existed and governments could be counted on to honor it, perhaps a governmental monetary system would be feasible without inflation.

In his most recent book, Denationalization of Money, well-known economist F. A. Von Hayek (author of Road to Serfdom) argues that "convertability is a safeguard necessary to impose upon a monopolist (i.e. governments) but unnecessary with competing suppliers who cannot maintain themselves in the business unless they provide money at least as advantageous to the user as anybody else." He calls for competition (among banks) in "providing good money," which he thinks would eliminate the need for a reserve system. Any reserve system other than gold, which he dismisses because" there just is not enough gold about," would require a storage system too expensive to be practical.

This argument of "too expensive" has been the conventional argument used against establishing any redemptive system other than gold. It was used, for instance, against the commodity reserve system proposed at the Bretton Woods conference in 1946 as the alternative to John Maynard Keynes's proposal to establish the present International Monetary Fund without any reserve backing. Von Hayek's proposal on the other hand, calls for a simultaneous development of competing currencies as the mechanism for insuring honesty among issuers. He admits, however, that his proposal is unlikely to be acted on in the near future, partly because of the difficulties and the complications of such a widespread simultaneous development. It would seem more likely that a practical beginning would have to be made through a single issuer acting as a model and inspiration for the possibility of an independent or private currency system. If this is true, then it also seems necessary that in order to develop confidence, a reserve, or redemption system be established.

Not only is such a redemption system necessary in order to create confidence for a private system of money issue, but the protection against inflation that such a system would create could be, in itself, the force that would bring about the denationalization of money. Once an available instrument for the investment of present, add-valuing currency could be created, the public would-in all likelihood-flock in great numbers to invest. They would do so to relieve themselves of the fear of devaluing dollars. Thus a mechanism would be created for the gradual transfer from a national money system to a private money system.

Problems and Obstacles to Creating a System for the Private Issue and Redemption of Money

In the past, the public has used two primary commodities for investment as a hedge against inflation: gold, and/or silver; and land, or natural resources. Gold traditionally has been the primary commodity used in private banking systems for redemption. Since the early 1930s, however, gold has lost its function for this capacity. Nevertheless, in today's world of rapidly increasing inflation, private investors see gold as protection against inflation and, consequently, its price has been soaring in international markets. Consideration is now being given to restoring gold at least as a partial redemption commodity in the International Monetary Fund. Nevertheless, the primary reasons economists argued against gold as a single redemption commodity in the past are as true today as ever: there is a shortage of gold on a world basis, and world production of all commodities bears no relation to the world production of gold. Few economists would argue for a return to the gold redemption system. Yet very few economists have come up with any alternatives for a world desperately seeking to keep money honest.

Land has been used very little as a redemption commodity. This is true for obvious reasons-the only case of which I know was in France with the "Assignats." As could be expected, it didn't last very long. Nevertheless, as an investment medium for protection against inflation, land is widely used around the world. In periods of increasing inflation, such investment has the effect of exacerbating inflationary forces, and tends to absorb vast amounts of capital into land, which by and of itself has no productive value. Thus land speculation is both caused by inflation and is a cause of inflation.

Moreover, investors who place large amounts of money in land find themselves in a nonliquid financial condition. For while the value of land may be appreciating as fast or faster than the inflationary rate, investors are unable to utilize the dollars invested without a long period of waiting for the sale of the land to take place. In the meantime, other investment opportunities may be missed due to the nonliquidity of the land. Moreover, land investment usually is in large units and must usually be sold as a unit, no matter whether the investor's need for funds is large or small. Thus, once sold the investor may have to find another (less favorable) place to invest the bulk of the funds released by the sale of his real estate. This nonliquidity, and nonflexible factor in land investment, is the major drawback for investors who are seeking to find a safe place to invest.


For more information, please contact the E. F. Schumacher Society:
140 Jug End Road | Great Barrington, MA 01230 USA
Phone: 01.413.528.1737 | E-mail: